Prediction of Ion Tiriac vs Geoff Masters Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
I. Tiriac vs G. Masters

Ion Tiriac

ROU

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Geoff Masters

AUS

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Tiriac 2 - 0 Masters

They have played 5 sets in total, with Ion Tiriac winning 5 and Geoff Masters winning 0. The last match between Ion Tiriac and Geoff Masters was at the Hamburg, 11-06-1973, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Ion Tiriac getting the victory 6-4 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tiriac	2
Masters	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) Hamburg(06-11-73)

Stats

Ion Tiriac

Geoff Masters

(QF) Kitzbuhel(07-19-71)

Stats

Ion Tiriac

Geoff Masters

I. Tiriac vs G. Masters H2H Profile

I. Tiriac	Stats	G. Masters
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
54.28% (241-203)	Career Total W/L	48.30% (241-258)
2	Clay	0
5	Titles	2
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

I. Tiriac vs G. Masters Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ion Tiriac has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Geoff Masters has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ion Tiriac, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Geoff Masters has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Ion Tiriac has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Geoff Masters has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Ion Tiriac has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Geoff Masters winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Ion Tiriac has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 163/93), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 31/46). Geoff Masters has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 70/68), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 63/63).
Player level: In the last year, Ion Tiriac has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Geoff Masters has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ion Tiriac winning 2 times and Geoff Masters being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ion Tiriac winning 5 and Geoff Masters winning 0.
The last match between Ion Tiriac and Geoff Masters was at the Hamburg, 11-06-1973, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Ion Tiriac getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ion Tiriac has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Geoff Masters has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ion Tiriac has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Geoff Masters has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Ion Tiriac has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Geoff Masters has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Ion Tiriac vs Geoff Masters Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

I. Tiriac vs G. Masters H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

I. Tiriac	Stats	G. Masters
2	H2H Matches Won	0
5	Sets Won	0
30	Games Won	14
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

I. Tiriac Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 26-02-1979
R3 Sandy MayerS. Mayer	L	6-2 4-6 6-3	Stats
Birmingham - 15-01-1979
R3 Guillermo VilasG. Vilas	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Hobart - 01-01-1979
R4 Phil DentP. Dent	L	6-7 6-4 6-3	Stats
R3 Andrew RaeA. Rae	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Australian Open - 26-12-1978
R2 Tony RocheT. Roche	L	6-3 6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

G. Masters Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Adelaide - 05-01-1981
R3 Chris JohnstoneC. Johnstone	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Australian Open - 26-12-1980
R2 Peter RennertP. Rennert	L	1-6 6-4 7-6 6-4	Stats
Sydney Outdoor - 15-12-1980
R2 Kevin CurrenK. Curren	L	6-2 6-7 7-5	Stats
Bangkok - 17-11-1980
R3 Jonathan SmithJ. Smith	L	6-2 1-6 6-2	Stats
Taipei - 10-11-1980
R3 Syd BallS. Ball	L	6-1 6-0	Stats

View All

I. Tiriac vs G. Masters Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

I. Tiriac	Stats	G. Masters
54.28% (241/203)	YTD Win/Loss	48.59% (241/255)
55.36% (661/533)	Sets Win/Loss	48.32% (618/661)
52.30% (5923/5401)	Games Win/Loss	49.84% (6105/6143)
40.26% (31/46)	Hard Win/Loss	50.72% (70/68)
63.67% (163/93)	Clay Win/Loss	50.00% (63/63)
37.50% (18/30)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.45% (36/53)
46.34% (19/22)	Grass Win/Loss	50.37% (68/67)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
467.84	Average Opponent Rank	517.15
53.49% (23/20)	Slam W/L	43.55% (27/35)
57.14% (12/9)	Masters W/L	35.71% (5/9)
64.44% (29/16)	Cups W/L	100.00% (3/0)
52.84% (177/158)	Main Tour W/L	49.40% (206/211)
51% (140/277)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (195/396)
61% (94/153)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	45% (43/95)
33% (1/3)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (5/9)
39% (43/109)	Deciding Set Win %	51% (81/160)
80% (261/209)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (227/193)
19% (261/50)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (227/34)
15% (176/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (265/44)